In-service EFL students’ peer assessment for the enhancement of their writing skills

Adane Paulos Zekarias

doi:10.30862/jri.v2i2.50

Authors

Adane Paulos Zekarias Dilla University, Ethiopia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v2i2.50

Keywords:

Writing, peer assessment, EFL, in-service students, perception

Abstract

This study attempted to investigate the extent to which peer assessment activities contribute to enhance in-service EFL students’ writing skills. Based on the constructivist theory, a case study design was implemented and both qualitative and quantitative research approaches were used to explore how 120 in-service students at Dilla University, Ethiopia, took part and responded to peer assessment activities to improve their writing competencies. Data was gathered through four tools, namely, questionnaire, focus group interviews, observation and document analysis. The findings suggest that peer assessment activity, though students’ perceptions and past experience impact, can aid peers in developing their writing performance through interaction, sharing feedback and addressing the challenges they face in the process of writing.

References

Al Fadda, H. (2012). Difficulties in academic writing: From the perspective of king saud university postgraduate students. English Language Teaching, 5(3), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n3p123

Andrade, H. L. (2013). Classroom assessment in the context of learning theory and research. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment (pp. 17–34). SAGE Publications.

Azarnoosh, M. (2013). Peer assessment in an EFL context: attitudes and friendship bias. Language Testing in Asia, 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-3-11

Bacha, N. N. (2012). Disciplinary writing in an EFL context from teachers’ and students’ perspectives. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(2), 233–256. http://www.ijbssnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_2_Special_Issue_January_2012/26.pdf

Chien, S.-Y., Hwang, G.-J., & Jong, M. S.-Y. (2020). Effects of peer assessment within the context of spherical video-based virtual reality on EFL students’ English-Speaking performance and learning perceptions. Computers & Education, 146, 103751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103751

Djaguna, F., Langasa, I. A., Husain, B., & Swara, M. M. (2021). Teacher responses of inserting role-playing strategy in EFL classroom. Journal of Research in Instructional, 1(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v1i2.18

Eggen, P. D., Kauchak, D. P., & Garry, S. (2012). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms (9th ed.). Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Falchikov, N. (2005). Improving assessment through student involvement: Practical solutions for aiding learning in higher and further education. Routledge.

Falchikov, N. (2007). The place of peers in learning and assessment. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education (pp. 138–153). Routledge.

Hansen, J. G., & Liu, J. (2005). Guiding principles for effective peer response. ELT Journal, 59(1), 31–38.

Harlen, W. (2012). The role of assessment in developing motivation for learning. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250808.n11

Harrison, K., Ohara, J., & McNamara, G. (2015). Re-Thinking assessment: Self- and peer-assessment as drivers of self-direction in learning. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 15(60), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.60.5

Husain, B., Suhernita, S., Abasa, Z., & Djaguna, F. (2021). Task-based language teaching methods integrated with local wisdom: The impact on students’ writing skills. Journal of Research in Instructional, 1(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v1i2.22

Janisch, C., Liu, X., & Akrofi, A. (2007). Implementing alternative assessment: Opportunities and obstacles. The Educational Forum, 71(3), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720709335007

Li, H., Xiong, Y., Hunter, C. V., Guo, X., & Tywoniw, R. (2020). Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1620679

Ma, L. (2021). An immersive context teaching method for college english based on artificial intelligence and machine learning in virtual reality technology. Mobile Information Systems, 2021, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/2637439

Mcleod, S. (2022). Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory of cognitive development. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/vygotsky.html

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Panadero, E., & Brown, G. T. L. (2017). Teachers’ reasons for using peer assessment: positive experience predicts use. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 32(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0282-5

Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Clark, R. J. (2018). Accountability in peer assessment: examining the effects of reviewing grades on peer ratings and peer feedback. Studies in Higher Education, 43(12), 2263–2278. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1320374

Perera, J., Mohamadou, G., & Kaur, S. (2010). The use of objective structured self-assessment and peer-feedback (OSSP) for learning communication skills: evaluation using a controlled trial. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(2), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-009-9191-1

Sadeghi, K., & Baneh, M. D. (2012). Relationship between student self-monitoring, type of peer feedback and EFL writing performance. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(5), 909–915. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.5.909-915

Seifert, T., & Feliks, O. (2019). Online self-assessment and peer-assessment as a tool to enhance student-teachers’ assessment skills. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(2), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1487023

Shen, B., Bai, B., & Xue, W. (2020). The effects of peer assessment on learner autonomy: An empirical study in a Chinese college English writing class. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, 100821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100821

Soltura, R. T. (2022). Designing a constructivist learning aid module in disentangling least mastered competencies in the wave motion. Journal of Research in Instructional, 2(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v2i1.24

Stančić, M. (2021). Peer assessment as a learning and self-assessment tool: a look inside the black box. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(6), 852–864. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1828267

Strijbos, J.-W., & Sluijsmans, D. (2010). Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.002

Topping, K. (2021). Peer assessment: Channels of operation. Education Sciences, 11(3), 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11030091

van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004

Vargas-Hernández, J. G., & Vargas-González, O. C. (2022). Strategies for meaningful learning in higher education. Journal of Research in Instructional, 2(1), 47–69. https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v2i1.41

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the Development of Children, 23(3), 34–41.

Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2018). Formative self-and peer assessment for improved student learning: the crucial factors of design, teacher participation and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1032–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1427698

Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001

Xu, D. (2022). Construction of an english research learning model based on constructivism and data mining under a cloud computing platform. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2022, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4579547

Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134–152.