Project module for strengthening the profile of Pancasila students in the perspective of 21st-century learning design microsoft

Authors

  • Prihantini Prihantini Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Qori Khoirunnisa Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v3i2.277

Keywords:

21st-century learning design, content analysis, profile of pancasila students, project module

Abstract

The objective of this study is to identify and evaluate the content of the module in terms of 21st-century learning design (21 CLD) dimensions. This study adopts a qualitative approach by applying the content analysis method of Krippendorff's model. The object of content analysis is the project module for strengthening the profile of Pancasila students with the theme of local wisdom for phase A of elementary school. The researcher is the primary tool employed in this study. The content analysis instrument uses a rubric that microsoft developed to determine the dimension level of each learning activity in the module. The data is collected using six phases to analyze the content, explicitly unitizing, sampling, recording, reducing, abductively inferring, and narrating. The project module for strengthening the profile of Pancasila students was identified as containing 5 of the six dimensions of microsoft's 21 CLD.

References

Alias, N., & Siraj, S. (2012). Effectiveness of Isman instructional design model in developing physics module based on learning style and appropriate technology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.002

Alismail, H. A. (2023). Heliyon Teachers ’ perspectives of utilizing distance learning to support 21st century skill attainment for K-3 elementary students during the COVID-19 pandemic era. Heliyon, 9(9), e19275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19275

Andersen, R., & Rustad, M. (2022). Using Minecraft as an educational tool for supporting collaboration as a 21st century skill. Computers and Education Open, 3(June), 100094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100094

Anggraena, Y., Sufyadi, S., Maisura, R., Chodidjah, I., Takwin, B., Cahyadi, S., Felicia, N., Gazali, H., Wijayanti, M. A., Khoiri, H. M., Matakupan, S. J., Siantajani, Y., & Kurnianingsih, S. (2020). Kajian pengembangan profil pelajar Pancasila (1st ed.). Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Perbukuan Kemendikbud RI.

Ariyana, Y., Pudjiastuti, A., Bestari, R., & Zamruni. (2018). Buku pegangan pembelajaran berorientasi pada keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi. Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kemendikbud.

Aslan, A. (2021). Problem- based learning in live online classes: Learning achievement, problem-solving skill, communication skill, and interaction. Computers and Education, 171(November 2020), 104237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104237

Bayley, S. H. (2022). Learning for adaptation and 21st-century skills: Evidence of pupils’ flexibility in Rwandan primary schools. International Journal of Educational Development, 93(June), 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2022.102642

Churchill, D., King, M., & Fox, B. (2013). Learning design for science education in the 21st century. Zbornik Instituta Za Pedagoska Istrazivanja, 45(2), 404–421. https://doi.org/10.2298/ZIPI1302404C

Damayanti, F., Vivien, H., Situmorang, M., & Trianung, T. (2023). The problem of education in Indonesia is the independent curriculum the solution. Scholar: Media Educational Scientific Journal, 13(5), 917–924.

Faulkner, J., & Latham, G. (2016). Adventurous lives: Teacher qualities for 21st century learners. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n4.9

Fisnani, Y., Utanto, Y., & Ahmadi, F. (2020). The development of e-module for batik local content in Pekalongan elementary school. Innovative Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology, 9(1), 40–47. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujet/article/view/35592

Fitriyani, F., Kurnia, I. R., Fadillah, S. N., & Oktaviani, A. M. (2023). Analysis of curriculum policy development and implementation of independent curriculum in elementary schools. Journal Of Education And Teaching Learning (JETL), 5(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.51178/jetl.v5i3.1504

Regulation of the Minister of Education, Culture, Research and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia Number 56 of 2022, Indonesia 2003 (2022).

Iwan, I., Sumitro, S. B., Ibrohim, I., & Rochman, F. (2023). Students’ critical thinking skills (2011-2020): A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Research in Instructional, 3(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v3i2.226

Karaca-Atik, A., Meeuwisse, M., Gorgievski, M., & Smeets, G. (2023). Uncovering important 21st-century skills for sustainable career development of social sciences graduates: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 39(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100528

Kuhn, D. (2016). Learning is the key twenty-first century skill. Learning: Research and Practice, 2(2), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2016.1205207

Kusumadewi, R. F., & Kusmaryono, I. (2022). Concept maps as dynamic tools to increase students’ understanding of knowledge and creative thinking. Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 12(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v12i1.11745

Lee, J., & Catling, S. (2016). Some perceptions of English geography textbook authors on writing textbooks. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 25(1), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2015.1106204

Logan, R. M., Johnson, C. E., & Worsham, J. W. (2021). Development of an e-learning module to facilitate student learning and outcomes. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 16(2), 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2020.10.007

Makaramani, R. (2015). 21st Century learning design for a telecollaboration project. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 622–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.567

Malone, S. A., Pritchard, V. E., & Hulme, C. (2022). Domain-specific skills, but not fine-motor or executive function, predict later arithmetic and reading in children. Learning and Individual Differences, 95, 102141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102141

Microsoft. (2023a). 21st century learning design. Learn Microsoft. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/training/paths/21st-century-learning-design/

Microsoft. (2023b). Deepen educational experiences with the 21 CLD ICT for learning dimension. Learn Microsoft. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/training/modules/deepen-educational-experiences/

Nisa, A. F., & Hikmah, N. (2023). Learning design innovation based on Tri N and STEAM in developing 21st century skills for elementary school students. 7(2), 187–194.

Park, J. H., Li, Y., & Niu, W. (2023). Revisiting creativity and critical thinking through content analysis. Journal of Creativity, 33(2), 100056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2023.100056

Peña-Ayala, A. (2021). A learning design cooperative framework to instill 21st century education. Telematics and Informatics, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101632

Poláková, M., Suleimanová, J. H., Madzík, P., Copuš, L., Molnárová, I., & Polednová, J. (2023). Soft skills and their importance in the labour market under the conditions of Industry 5.0. Heliyon, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18670

Sabon, Y. O. S., Istiyono, E., & Widihastuti, W. (2022). Developing “Pancasila student profile” instrument for self-assessment. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 26(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v26i1.45144

Seo, S., Van Orman, D., Beattie, M., Paxson, L., & Murray, J. (2023). Breaking down the silos: Student experience of transformative learning through interdisciplinary project-based learning (IPBL). Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 32(May), 100440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2023.100440

Sholeh, M., Widodo, B. S., & Putra, B. A. W. (2023). Evaluating the Implementation of the independent curriculum policy in Indonesia: Sentiment Analysis. 4(3), 422–431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46627/silet

Soltura, R. T. (2022). Designing a constructivist learning aid module in disentangling least mastered competencies in the wave motion. Journal of Research in Instructional, 2(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v2i1.24

Stehle, S. M., & Peters-Burton, E. E. (2019). Developing student 21st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1

Sugiyono. (2007). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta

Taar, J., & Palojoki, P. (2022). Applying interthinking for learning 21st-century skills in home economics education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 33(April 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100615

Teo, P. (2019). Teaching for the 21st century: A case for dialogic pedagogy. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21(January), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.03.009

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.

Valtonen, T., Hoang, N., Sointu, E., Näykki, P., Virtanen, A., Pöysä-Tarhonen, J., Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., Mäkitalo, K., & Kukkonen, J. (2021). How pre-service teachers perceive their 21st-century skills and dispositions: A longitudinal perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 116(November 2020), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106643

Yani, B. S. H. (2014). 21St century learning design project based learning : School campaign for better future. The 61st TEFLIN International Conference, 2012, 7–9. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/43024892.pdf

Zain, I. M. (2017). The collaborative instructional design system (CIDS): Visualizing the 21st century learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(12), 2259–2266. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051216

Downloads

Published

2023-12-03