Implications of cognitive abilities in students’ performance in physics using group dynamics and visual-clue strategies

Authors

  • Emmanuel E. Achor Benue State University, Nigeria
  • Philip M. Ngbea Benue State University, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v2i1.33

Keywords:

Group dynamics strategy, visual clue strategy, demonstration method, academic performance, cognitive abilities

Abstract

The study examined the implications of cognitive abilities of students on their academic performance when taught Physics using group dynamics and visual clue strategies. The quasi-experimental research design was adopted. The study population was 1,920 SSII students from 48 Secondary Schools in Makurdi metropolis from where the sample of 157 was drawn. The instruments: Physics Students’ Performance Test (PSPT) and Students’ Cognitive Ability Test (SCAT) were used for data collection. Hypotheses were tested at 0.05 level using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). There was significant difference between the mean academic performance of students taught Physics using group dynamics strategy, visual strategy and demonstration method; there was significant difference among the mean abilities of students when group dynamics strategy was used and also when visual clue strategy was used in teaching Physics; there is significant difference between the interaction effect of strategies and cognitive abilities on academic performance of students in Physics. The study recommended among others that since the interaction effect of strategies and cognitive abilities on academic performance of students in Physics was significant, the use of both strategies could be useful in fostering the academic performance of students of high ability groups while use with low and moderate ability groups should be with caution

References

Achor, E. E., & Gbadamosi, B. O. (2020). Raising the achievement and retention levels of secondary school students in Physics through Brain-Based Learning Strategy in Taraba State, Nigeria. BSU Journal of Science, Mathematics and Computer Education, 1(2), 87–97. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3789743

Achor, Emmanuel E., & Ejeh, E. E. (2019). Raising cognitive ability and achievement levels of some Nigeria students in home economics using cognitive acceleration training programme. American Journal of Creative Education, 2(3), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.20448/815.23.110.127

Agogo, P. O., & Achor, E. E. (2019). Research methods and statistics for beginners. Optimism Publishers.

Alikhani, M., & Bagheridoust, E. (2017). The effect of group dynamics-oriented instruction on developing Iranian EFL learners’ speaking ability and willingness to communicate. English Language Teaching, 10(11), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n11p44

Asaph, A., & Raja, B. (2016). Efficient E-learning by dint of cognitive abilities. Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 7–10. http://www.imanagerpublications.com/Article.aspx?ArticleId=8159&issueid=0

Ashby, F. G., Ell, S. W., & Waldron, E. M. (2003). Procedural learning in perceptual categorization. Memory & Cognition, 31(7), 1114–1125. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196132

Ayres, P., & Paas, F. (2007). Making instructional animations more effective: a cognitive load approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 695–700. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1343

Dakang, P. D., Achor, E. E., & Otor, E. E. (2021). Utilizing interactive students notebook with feedback strategies to enhance secondary students science process skills acquisitions, performance in and attitude towards physics. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), 11(4), 453–459. https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.11.04.2021.p11261

Deary, I. J., Strand, S., Smith, P., & Fernandes, C. (2007). Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence, 35(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.02.001

Dewi, L. (2019). The Influence of group dynamics to students’ creativity in Business Management Class of Universitas Ciputra. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 17(4), 713–718. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2019.017.04.15

DiPerna, J. C., Volpe, R. J., & Elliott, S. N. (2002). A Model of Academic Enablers and Elementary Reading/Language Arts Achievement. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2002.12086157

Gaard, T. (2018). Effectiveness of visual cues during transitions in a third grade classroom. The Graduate Faculty of Minnesota State University Moorhead. In Dissertations, Theses, and Projects (Vol. 120). https://red.mnstate.edu/thesis/120

Harso, A., Wolo, D., & Damopolii, I. (2021). Kontribusi pengetahuan awal dan motivasi belajar terhadap miskonsepsi siswa pada pembelajaran fisika. ORBITA: Jurnal Kajian, Inovasi Dan Aplikasi Pendidikan Fisika, 7(2), 351–358. https://doi.org/10.31764/orbita.v7i2.5791

Kaswa, J. M. (2015). The effect of visual learning aids on students’ academic performance in public secondary schools: A case of Magu District Secondary Schools [Doctoral dissertation, University of Tanzania]. UT Campus Repository. http://repository.out.ac.tz/1297/1/DISSERTATION_-_JOSEPH_KASWA.pdf

Liyanage, N. M. (2015). Effect of visual cues and outcome feedback on physics problem solving in an online system. [Master's Thesis, Kansas State University]. KSU Campus Library. https://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/handle/2097/20389

Mbaubedari, S., Sirait, S. H. K., & Jeni, J. (2022). Encouraging students’ learning outcomes using the information search method. Inornatus: Biology Education Journal, 2(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.30862/inornatus.v2i1.262

Musa, J. H., Achor, E. E., & Ellah, B. O. (2021). Fostering achievement and retention in basic science using simulation and demonstration strategies. Journal of Research in Instructional, 1(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v1i2.19

NECO. (2020). Examinations’ Report. Department of Records and Statistics.

Ogunleye, B. O., & Babajide, V. F. T. (2011). Generative instructional strategy enhances senior secondary school students’ achievement in physics. European Journal of Educational Studies, 3(3), 453–463. https://ir.unilag.edu.ng/handle/123456789/9711

Okoronka, A. U. (2004). Model based instructional strategies as determinants of students learning outcomes in secondary Physics in Lagos State. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Ibadan.

Oludipe, D. I. (2012). Gender Difference in Nigerian Junior Secondary Students’ Academic Achievement in Basic Science. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 2(1), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2012.02.01.93

Pambudi, G. D., Winangsih, F., Nunaki, J. H., Nusantari, E., & Damopolii, I. (2022). Encouraging students’ metacognitive skills through inquiry learning. Inornatus: Biology Education Journal, 2(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.30862/inornatus.v2i1.272

Rauch, A. & Frese, M. (2014). Born to be an entrepreneur? Revisiting the personality approach to entrepreneurship. In J. R. Baum, M. Frese, & R. A. Baron (Eds.), The psychology of entrepreneurship (p. 26). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750989

Rumalolas, N., Rosely, M. S. Y., Nunaki, J. H., Damopolii, I., & Kandowangko, N. Y. (2021). The inquiry-based student book integrated with local resources: The impact on student science process skill. Journal of Research in Instructional, 1(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v1i2.17

Salas, E., Wildman, J. L., & Piccolo, R. F. (2009). Using Simulation-Based Training to Enhance Management Education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(4), 559–573. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2009.47785474

Thomas, L. E., & Lleras, A. (2007). Moving eyes and moving thought: On the spatial compatibility between eye movements and cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(4), 663–668. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196818

WAEG. (2020). Examinations’ Report. Department of Records and Statistics

Wang, M. C., Haertel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1997). Learning influences. Psychology and Educational Practice, 199–211.

Winnie, M. (2020). Group Dynamics and Student Cognitive Engagement in Class Tasks in Institutions of Higher Learning. – An Integrative Review. International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, 7(12), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0712006

Downloads

Published

2022-06-20